Depends on the mods you are using. A number of mods require all apps to be hooked to work in full. You can see what packages each mod hooks here:
https://code.highspec.ru/Mikanoshi/CustoMIUIzer/src/branch/master/app/src/main/java/name/mikanoshi/customiuizer/MainModule.java
Hooks in initZygote method are applied to all processes.
Anyway, LSPosed is going to add interface for modules to query and modify its module scope dynamically, so that for some features that need to hook extra packages, module can actively ask user to add them. This is the current milestone for LSPosed.
LSPosed now supports `xposedscope` to declare its module scope (see: https://github.com/LSPosed/LSPosed/wiki/Module-Scope). I think EdXposed will support it someday...
Anyway, LSPosed is going to add interface for modules to query and modify its module scope dynamically, so that for some features that need to hook extra packages, module can actively ask user to add them. This is the current milestone for LSPosed.
@lovesykun
System-wide framework mods require all packages to be hooked, otherwise they can only work partially.
What's LSPosed anyway? Can it have app list mode disabled? :) That's all I care about. Loading modules for each process is just a performance hog.
@lovesykun
System-wide framework mods require all packages to be hooked, otherwise they can only work partially.
What's LSPosed anyway? Can it have app list mode disabled? :) That's all I care about. Loading modules for each process is just a performance hog.
Unfortunatelly, no. LSPosed is a fork of EdXposed and more aggressive.
It removed app list mode and requies all modules to have activation scope.
> Can it have app list mode disabled?
Unfortunatelly, no. LSPosed is a fork of EdXposed and more aggressive.
It removed app list mode and requies all modules to have activation scope.
Even more agressive? :D You guys already chose to ignore the existence of framework mods and assumed that all Xposed modules only modify some particular packages.
Even more agressive? :D You guys already chose to ignore the existence of framework mods and assumed that all Xposed modules only modify some particular packages.
I want to use Edxposed's Activation Scope feature, which apps should I choose to work for?
Depends on the mods you are using. A number of mods require all apps to be hooked to work in full. You can see what packages each mod hooks here: https://code.highspec.ru/Mikanoshi/CustoMIUIzer/src/branch/master/app/src/main/java/name/mikanoshi/customiuizer/MainModule.java Hooks in initZygote method are applied to all processes.
It's hard for a non-developer to understand... Can you tell me the package name of all effective apps directly?
Name of the packages are in
pkg.equals(...)
LSPosed now supports
xposedscope
to declare its module scope (see: https://github.com/LSPosed/LSPosed/wiki/Module-Scope). I think EdXposed will support it someday...Anyway, LSPosed is going to add interface for modules to query and modify its module scope dynamically, so that for some features that need to hook extra packages, module can actively ask user to add them. This is the current milestone for LSPosed.
@lovesykun System-wide framework mods require all packages to be hooked, otherwise they can only work partially. What's LSPosed anyway? Can it have app list mode disabled? :) That's all I care about. Loading modules for each process is just a performance hog.
Unfortunatelly, no. LSPosed is a fork of EdXposed and more aggressive. It removed app list mode and requies all modules to have activation scope.
Even more agressive? :D You guys already chose to ignore the existence of framework mods and assumed that all Xposed modules only modify some particular packages.